Bruce Nauman at NoguerasBlanchard
Bruce Nauman at NoguerasBlanchard
“Violent Incident” by Bruce Nauman, in the exhibition “On affection: Cally Spooner and Bruce Nauman” NoguerasBlanchard, Barcelona
From January, 28 until March, 10, 2017
|Drawing | Composition of 6 drawings, mixed media on paper, framed in plexiglass vitrine and table (optional)|
|85 x 100 x 75 cm.|
These are drawings done with a pencil, at once defined and unconcluded: a practice, that of drawing, which for Dauder is a parallel process, often on the fringes of the larger finished pieces. Drawing is a more primary exercise, out of which latent or buried aspects arise and are released. Drawing is experienced as an activity that is necessary for the creative process to take its course, to order impulses, to distil and visualize, from close to and from a distance, to study and reflect, even if the resulting compositions often have no specific function or destination. Some drawings are spontaneous and fast, others slow and worked on in different phases.
In the last analysis, the mystery posed by these drawings is the ability of the artist’s hand to be a channel of transmission and a translator of retinal impressions, of traces of memory, of the unequal accumulation of memories. By means of drawing, these elements may surface again in new configurations, transformed by their more or less prolonged passage through the neuronal circuits. New figures and images emerge, which in turn feed new cycles of perceptual impressions and assimilations traces that will be translated into who knows what new configurations by the hands of who knows what other artist. The fact is that when all is said and done we are pieces in a great chain of transmission of which the drawing is an occasional record, a link that fixes an instant of this tireless dynamism.
Patricia Dauder trained as an artist in Barcelona and Holland in the 1990s. Since then, her practice has evolved coherently in the fields of drawing, sculpture, film and the artist’s book and, to a lesser extent, photography. Her pieces are the result of slow and intuitive working processes, in which formal exploration guided by intuition and chance plays a significant part. The concept of montage is also of central importance to Dauder: her pieces often end up adopting a composite form, as sets of several elements that are closely related to one another.
Although many of Dauder’s works have as their starting point the observation of her real immediate physical environment, it often happens that, in the course of the creative process, the figurative often retreats almost to the point of disappearing, becoming a mere trace or a barely perceptible trail. And, in her practice, the idea of “trace” is linked to depth, a recurring element that Dauder explores through methods such as layering, surface scraping and the emptying out of volumes. Similarly, in her film works and in her books, the temporal dimension marked by the rhythm of contemplation which these formats demand becomes an element of exploration, through which Dauder effectively expands the meaning potential of her pieces.
Für Elise de Ludwig van Beethoven en orden de tono, 2009
|Videoinstallation | Video and framed score|
|A framed sheet of blank music paper. Next to it a screen. Minimalist rigour. In a perfectly photographed static shot, a tail-coated pianist takes his seat and begins to play. The notes develop a linear crescendo in which there is no very clear distinction between cadence and stridency, in a kind of progressive singsong. Although we follow the movement of the pianist’s hands and arms, the audio imposes itself on the static spectrum of the visual, making the ultimately captivating absence of acoustic harmony a kind of ridiculous challenge to the connotations of sobriety offered by the images.|
What is the meaning of all this? To answer the question we need only turn to the title: Für Elise by Ludwig van Beethoven in Order of Pitch. It is not, then, a case of simply wrecking the tune of the famous piece, or of discrediting the rigour of the performance that is automatically associated with the culture to which the composer belongs, which would seem to be endorsed by the knowing gesture of putting the credits in German. These are side effects — touches of irony that are deployed naturally, as an added value — in the exercises in reordering the world to be found in the works produced by Daniel Jacoby between 2007 and 2009.
In his obsessive analysis and questioning of the logics of information and the hierarchies that govern what we consider to be real, Jacoby spent the early part of his artistic career to applying the systems of measurement of science to other spheres linked to everyday life, the media or specific work contexts. By making hypothetically futile applications of strict methodologies in seemingly capricious scenarios he lays bare the relativity of the modes of reading and cataloguing with which we set out to engage with certain aspects of existence.
With a tone that is more playful than otherwise, with the rigour of a researcher, often working with people from other creative or scientific fields, and inspired by a minimalist aesthetic and ethic which he leavens with a good deal irony, Jacoby approaches reality from odd angles, decontextualizing the elements he uses from their internal logic, stretching their parameters to new possible meanings or simply to nonsense.
A print publication with the weather forecast for 20 February for the next hundred years in Mollet del Vallès; a sound piece with the 79 instances of the word ‘you’ on the Beatles album Abbey Road; a video with the 271 instances of the word ‘no’ in the film A Clockwork Orange; another video with all the words of the first ten minutes of a public speech by Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez in alphabetical order; a shop window with graphs charting the chromatic breakdown of the covers of the four largest-circulation Spanish newspapers over one month; a metric calculation of the size of the concepts of large and small, or the rearranging by height of all the books in a library are among the most iconic works of this process.
Together with A Toblerone of Exactly 50 g 491 Toblerones of Approximately 50 g — in which an exhaustive comparative study was conducted to find the chocolate bar with the exact weight indicated on the packaging was followed up by an exhibition, a print publication and the handing out of free Toblerones — Für Elise by Ludwig van Beethoven in Order of Pitch represents the coming to full artistic maturity of the series of works that constitute the first stage in Daniel Jacoby’s oeuvre. This conclusion of a stage is also a turning point, prior to the methodological bootlegging between the verifiable and the speculative made way for the narrativity that has oriented his projects since then.
Antoni Abad was born in Lleida in 1956 and is a History of Art graduate from the University of Barcelona. After creating a series of large-scale, interwoven paintings that were midway between painting and sculpture, he went on to produce sculptures in foam rubber in 1985, which he made public the following year at the Espai 10 Gallery of the Fundació Joan Miró in Barcelona. Since then his work has evolved, both in the use of new materials (such as components of mecalux (metal shelving systems) and tape measures) and, following his interest in new media, into the world of video and Net-Art in 1995. This was succeeded from 2004 onwards by the use of mobile phones as creative and communicative tools, culminating in an onsite work entitled *TAXI in collaboration with taxi drivers from Mexico City. He continued this work the following year with the Gypsy communities of Lleida and Leon, as well as further collaborations with other communities in Madrid, Barcelona, San José de Costa Rica and Sao Paulo. These projects can be followed on the web page www.zexe.net. These latest projects have won him numerous awards, such as the National Visual Arts Prize 2006, awarded by the Government of Catalonia, and the Electronic Ars Festival in Linz the same year.
Bern and Hilla Becher
The importance of the work of Bernd and Hilla Becher has to do not only with their artistic activity but most of all with their teaching at the Kunstakademie in Düsseldorf. Bernd (Siegen,1931) and Hilla (Postdam, 1934 – 2015) Becher met when they were students of painting in Düsseldorf. In 1959 they did their first photographic work together. As teachers, they have influenced the new generations of German artists, including some of the outstanding names who have redefined photographic creation, such as Thomas Ruff, Andreas Gursky, Candida Höffer or Thomas Struth.
Bernd and Hilla Becher’s photographs document industrial landscapes which are in the process of disappearing through deserted factories, water towers or gasometers, which are shown in isolation. They base their work on typologies and approach the different motifs almost like a clinical dissection, which finds its closest antecedent in the anthropological documentations made during the period of the Weimar Republic by August Sander. With their photographs the Bechers show a past which, unlike the present, they can control and order through their compositions. These works, which they have been doing since the fifties, have been regarded as the supreme model of conceptual art in photography.
Their work has been shown at Documenta 5 (1972), 6 (1977) and 11 (2002), as well as the São Paulo Biennial (1977). They have received many awards, among them the Golden Lion at the Venice Biennale in 1990.
In a way, Alicia Framis’ work is a fable. Starting from a very specific observation of her surroundings she tells stories with a real base and a fictitious development that show up some of the flaws of modern society, for which she tries to find a solution, undoubtedly involving an indirect ethical lesson. This investigation into the world around her has evolved from the private in the works of the 90s such as Cinema Solo or Dreamkeeper to the social in series like Anti-dog or Secret Strike. In all cases her projects follow a recognisable schema: a living documentary investigation of a series of conflicts which human beings (often, but not exclusively, women) face in an individualistic contemporary society which overprotects itself from the other. From there she decides to provide practical solutions to the problem. Everything begins with an idea and ends up becoming a plan, a complex project through which she approaches the same problem from different viewpoints and to which she eventually tries to offer solutions. In that way her works end up being organised in corpora of meaning that define a specific problem, whether loneliness, fear of aggression, the need to be loved or alienation.
Dora García’s work is strongly characterized by the involvement of its viewers, who are urged to take a stand on ethically contentious questions, to commit themselves to a closer examination of these matters and to reflect on the institutional nature of the setting in which their encounter with works of art takes place.
Hers is a practice based on research, and one that focuses on subjects which recur and are woven into the whole fabric of her production, such as the interest in the history of anti-institutional movements (with particular attention to anti-psychiatry), the figure of the artist as outsider and mechanisms of communication, whether linguistic or not. These subjects are not explained to the viewer, but laid out with an attitude that verges on a challenge: documents, ambiguous reenactments in performances, lectures and talks, videos and books are presented in the exhibition space as archives, sophisticated sets of references, reworkings. Viewers have to choose their own key of interpretation, decide what attitude to take, the degree of interaction they wish to have with the work. Or remain impervious to the provocation of an enigmatic theme, ambiguously presented in such a way as to make people think. As a complement to this total openness of interpretation, García prepares a series of instruments, often in the form of websites, to share her sources with viewers, to inform them about her projects and keep them up to date on their development and to get to know their opinions and reactions through blogs and social networks.
Rodney Graham works conceptually with the formats of the work of art. A Canadian artist of many interests, he belongs to the generation from that country who have had a major influence on contemporary art: Jeff Wall, Stan Douglas or Ian Wallace.
Graham’s work swings between conceptual reasoning in the appreciation of the world and life experience with a strong emotional charge. Indeed he is a man of many faces, at times a visual artist, at others a musician who does exhibitions or produces musical compositions. The works he shows in an artistic context also have that twofold dynamic, some with a strong element of humour and others conducive to calm reflection.
His thoughts on the appreciation of the contemporary world have brought him close to photography. For him it is the technological gaze at our environment, and he uses his work to lay bare the relation between image and reality. His photographs of trees upside down refer to the camera obscura, the physical procedure for creating “objective” images of what we see, although they appear inverted.
His work has been shown in high profile contexts, such as the Skulptur Projekte in Münster in 1987 or the Venice Biennale, where he represented Canada in 1997.
(Vidreres, Girona, 1981)
Degree in Fine Art (Sculpture) from the Universitat de Barcelona (2003) where she is studying for her PhD (‘Time and Place in Contemporary Art’) and complementing her earlier training in the Master of Digital Photography. Idep. In 2008/9 she took the postgraduate course in Arte Conducta /Behaviour Art) led by Tania Bruguera at I.S.A., Havana, Cuba, which has influenced her work and her desire to work with ‘the real’, continuing her studies in Soma, Mexico (2012).
Her work has been exhibited at the Biennials in Havana, Pontevedra, Ljubljana, Liverpool, Athens and Göteborg and at the Triennial of Tallinn, Sorocaba and São Paulo as well as in museums in Barcelona, The Hague, Madrid, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, Paris, New York, Chicago, Miami, Formigine, London, Stockholm, Istanbul, Leipzig, Bucharest, Zagreb, Cali, Lima, Berlin, Graz, Vienna, Limerick, Budapest …
Of note among her recent solo exhibitions are those at: Arts Santa Mònica, Barcelona; EspacioMeBAS, Museo de Santander; Galerija Miroslav Kraljvić, Zagreb, Croatia; Salle Zero, Havana, Cuba.
Among the received awards she has received are: RAC prize, Madrid; GAC-DKV prize, Barcelona; 5×5 International Contemporary Art Prize, EACC, Castelló (2014); IMMA, Dublin; Iaspis Residency, Göteborg (2013); Agita grants, Figueres (2012); Injuve prize for creation, Madrid (2011); Miquel Casablanques prize, Barcelona (2010); Guasch Coranty grant for creation (2009) …
Her artistic and social commitment prompts her to collaborate with various self-managed social centres. www.nuriaguell.net
Isidro López-Aparicio Pérez
The son of a famous commercial photographer, Andreas Gursky (Leipzig, 1955) studied with Otto Steinert at the Folkwang School, which specialises in commercial photography and photojournalism. He was a student of Bernd and Hilla Becher at the Kunstakademie in Düsseldorf and began to achieve international recognition in the early 80s. He is one of the most brillant artists of his generation, who has succeeded in capturing the structures and forms of organisation of late capitalist societies. Tendencies, progress, civilisation, systems of trade and exchange, of leisure and communication are the leading motifs of his work. The stock market, techno parties, factories and shops of both luxury brands (like Prada) and establishments of the everything for a pound variety become representatives of the contemporary world. His photographs are of public and semi-public spaces in big cities on several continents, from Hong Kong to Cairo by way of New York, Brasilia, Stockholm or Singapore. Rather than bearing witness to events or actions, he presents normal situations that define our ways of living and relating to one another in minute detail. The world he shows us is big, technological and global. By confronting us with reality, not as it is but as it is represented, he conveys to the spectator a feeling of strangeness that triggers a questioning of the world we live in and the structures that organise our lives.